A perplexing medical paradox now has an explanation according to research undertaken at Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry and published in the current issue of the Public Library of Science. The paradox is that taking folic acidWhat it does: Critical during pregnancy for the development of a baby’s brain and nerves. Also essential for brain and nerve function. Needed for utilising…, a B vitamin, lowers homocysteineHomocysteine is an amino acid found in the blood. Elevated levels of homocysteine have been associated with narrowing and hardening of the arteries, an increased… in the blood which, epidemiological evidence clearly indicates, should lower the risk of heart attack, but clinical trials of homocysteine lowering B6, B12 and folic acid have not shown the expected benefit, except for strokes. For example, among elderly people if a person’s homocysteine level is above 13, it predicts no less than two thirds of all cardiovascular deaths five years on while cholesterol is a very poor predictor.
The explanation is surprisingly simple; lowering homocysteine prevents platelets sticking, which stops blood clots – something aspirin also does, so if people in the trials were already taking aspirin there would be no extra benefit in lowering homocysteine with folic acid. Aspirin was in fact widely used by participants in the trials because they were mainly conducted in patients who had already had a heart attack or other cardiovascular diseases. Research led by Dr David Wald at the Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine at Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry showed that there was a difference in the reduction in heart disease events between the five trials with the lowest aspirin use (60 per cent of the participants took aspirin) and the five trials with the highest use (91 per cent took aspirin).
The observed risk reduction was six per cent but it would have been 15 per cent if no one had been taking aspirin. Research was based on 75 epidemiological studies involving about 50,000 participants and clinical trials involving about 40,000 participants. “The explanation has important implications,” said Dr David Wald, the lead author of the paper. “The negative clinical trial evidence should not close the door on folic acid – folic acid may still be of benefit in people who have not had a heart attack because they will generally not be taking aspirin”. This level of risk reduction suggests that taking the B vitamins instead of aspirin will have a greater protective effect. Unlike aspirin, which damages the gut, the potential side-effects of B vitamins is better memory and mood. If you’d like to find out more about homocysteine read The H Factor. You can test your level with a home test kit. My Special Report How to Lower Your Homocysteine Level explains which amount and combination of B vitamins gives you the most protection.
Join the Conversation on our Facebook Page